Post banners

Four category banners for articles, shorts and LinkedIn posts.

Delivery size 1200x675 (16:9). The generator caps at 836x470, so the shipped files are Lanczos upscales with mild unsharp, measured crisper on dense text than a plain resize. The untouched 836x470 originals are kept alongside as *-836.png for any future re-render, and the 4-up sheet as _source-sheet.png.

A 4px inset is taken off every edge before scaling: splitting the 4-up sheet leaves a bright 2-4px seam on whichever edges faced the interior divider, which would otherwise render as a stray light line along the banner.

All four are cleared for use as of the 2026-08-23 revision. Every one passed the checklist at the bottom of this file.

What these are for

Fallbacks, not a house style. A post that already has its own graphic keeps it. These exist so a post without one still has a proper header instead of nothing, and so the category is legible at a glance.

Never replace existing article art with a banner. As of 2026-08-23, 30 of 36 articles carry their own image and were left untouched; the 5 that had none were assigned a banner by category, and articles/index.md is a listing page and does not need one.

Usage

In an article’s front matter:

image: /assets/brand/banners/concept-explainer.png          # OG / social card
featured_image: /assets/brand/banners/concept-explainer.png # rendered at top of article

image drives the Open Graph and Twitter card. featured_image renders the banner in the article body. Set both to the same file unless there is a reason not to.

The set

File Category Tagline Use for
architecture.png Architecture Systems. Layers. Connections. Posts about the stack itself, or any named layer
concept-explainer.png Concept / Explainer Ideas. Clarity. Understanding. Introducing an idea, defining a term
research-technical.png Research / Technical Depth. Rigor. Evidence. Papers, evidence-led argument, measurement
commentary-opinion.png Commentary / Opinion Perspective. Insight. Provocation. Position pieces, industry commentary

architecture.png and research-technical.png both name the seven layers and both match /stack/. The other two carry no layer text.

architecture.png now carries a one-line gloss per layer, so it works as a standalone explainer rather than only as decoration. research-technical.png nests Tools, Memory, Retrieval and Systems inside the L2 Harness box and adds Identity & Scope under L3 Agent, which is the correct containment: those are harness components, not layers.

What the revision fixed

The first cut of architecture.png labelled the stack with a superseded draft taxonomy, printed eight labels for seven layers, and repeated “RETRIEVAL” across two different icons. research-technical.png had the same taxonomy problem plus rendering artifacts: “CONTEXT” and “MEMORY” each printed twice, and a corrupted OUTPU 1T'f above “OUTPUT”.

Both are resolved. research-technical.png also improved conceptually: Memory, Retrieval, Tools and IO/Systems are now drawn as components in a supporting row rather than as competing top-level layers, which is both correct and a clearer diagram than the original.

Known, accepted

Checklist for any future banner that names the layers

The rule in mode.md: anything that names or depicts the layers must agree with /stack/. Before replacing a file here:

Human-Curated, AI-Enabled (HCAE)